{"id":144,"date":"2008-09-26T20:12:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-27T00:12:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=144"},"modified":"2008-09-26T20:12:00","modified_gmt":"2008-09-27T00:12:00","slug":"week-four-picks-5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=144","title":{"rendered":"Week Four Picks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve got this weird feeling we may see a number of upsets this week. I have no scientific evidence to support that, mind you. It&#8217;s just that the picking seems too easy, too automatic. And that never seems to work out in professional football. Still, I can&#8217;t tell you where the big upsets are coming. Because when I look at these games &#8230; well, a lot of them just seem pretty damned easy and automatic. So I&#8217;ll lay it out straight and leave it to you to figure out where my reasoning is flawed.<\/p>\n<p><b>Atlanta (+7.5) at Carolina<\/b><br \/>I was gonna start out by saying that I&#8217;m still not sold on Carolina. The Panthers are weak offensively. And while they&#8217;d appeared solid enough on defense for the first two weeks of the season, they were exposed <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter?game_id=29563&#038;season=2008&#038;displayPage=tab_gamecenter&#038;week=REG3\" target=\"_blank\">last week<\/a>, not by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/players\/adrianpeterson\/profile?id=PET260705\" target=\"_blank\">Adrian Peterson<\/a>, but by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/players\/gusfrerotte\/profile?id=FRE682395\" target=\"_blank\">Gus Frerotte<\/a>. That doesn&#8217;t do much to recommend a D. But then I realized that I&#8217;m not sold on Atlanta, either. The Falcons look OK when they&#8217;re playing a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter?game_id=29529&#038;season=2008&#038;displayPage=tab_gamecenter&#038;week=REG1\" target=\"_blank\">Detroit<\/a> or a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter?game_id=29560&#038;season=2008&#038;displayPage=tab_gamecenter&#038;week=REG3\" target=\"_blank\">Kansas City<\/a>, but put them up against a real professional football team and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter?game_id=29553&#038;season=2008&#038;displayPage=tab_gamecenter&#038;week=REG2\" target=\"_blank\">things get ugly quick<\/a>. And the Panthers aren&#8217;t the Bucs, but neither are they the Lions. So I&#8217;m splitting the difference, taking Carolina straight up, and the Falcons with the points.<\/p>\n<p><b>Cleveland (+3) at Cincinnati<\/b><br \/> Every now and again, something happens in the NFL that exposes a rule so obscure that even the geekiest of the rule book geeks are left scratching their heads. If there&#8217;s a rule defining a way for both teams to lose a given game, this game seems likely to bring it to light. Otherwise, I&#8217;m taking the Bengals straight up (because they&#8217;re at home) and the Browns with the points (because I still suspect they&#8217;re slightly less awful than the home team). And I&#8217;m expecting we&#8217;ll see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/players\/bradyquinn\/profile?id=QUI529720\" target=\"_blank\">Brady Quinn<\/a> lined up under center when the Browns come back from their bye two weeks from now.<\/p>\n<p><b>Houston (+7.5) at Jacksonville<\/b><br \/>If it weren&#8217;t for the fact that last week&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter?game_id=29572&#038;season=2008&#038;displayPage=tab_gamecenter&#038;week=REG3\" target=\"_blank\">huge victory<\/a> still only got them to 1-2 on the season, you might expect to see a letdown game for Jacksonville here. But they are 1-2. So you won&#8217;t. But you also won&#8217;t see the Jags win by more than four.<\/p>\n<p><b>Denver (-9.5) at Kansas City<\/b><br \/>The Broncos are gonna need to get more out of their D at some point this season. Probably. But not this week. The Chiefs don&#8217;t have an offense, so there&#8217;s nothing to stop. The Broncos, on the other hand, have what&#8217;s been rather a high-powered offense, which is bad news for the Chiefs, who balance their lack of an offense with a lack of a defense. Denver by three touchdowns.<\/p>\n<p><b>San Francisco (+6) at New Orleans<\/b><br \/>Don&#8217;t be shocked if this one ends up in an upset. The 49ers don&#8217;t have much going for them, but they do appear to have a decent pass defense. And the Saints don&#8217;t have a running game. Now, don&#8217;t take that to mean I&#8217;m picking San Fran. I&#8217;m not. Because New Orleans <i>ought<\/i> to be able to get the job done. And the Saints are at home. But I&#8217;m not giving six. I&#8217;m keeping my money far away from this game. And I&#8217;m not gonna pass out if the Niners come out ahead.<\/p>\n<p><b>Arizona (+1.5) at NY Jets<\/b><br \/>The Cardinals are the better team here, regardless of <a href=\"http:\/\/sports.espn.go.com\/nfl\/news\/story?id=3611615\" target=\"_blank\">whatever&#8217;s up with Brett Favre&#8217;s ankle<\/a>. But the Cardinals are also traveling two time zones to the east for the second consecutive week. And I may be crazy, but I&#8217;m not picking any team that&#8217;s doing that kind of traveling. Jets by three.<\/p>\n<p><b>Green Bay (+1.5) at Tampa Bay<\/b><br \/>Let me ask you this: Do you think it&#8217;s possible that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/players\/briangriese\/profile?id=GRI028314\" target=\"_blank\">Brian Griese<\/a> has actually turned into the guy we saw in<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter?game_id=29562&#038;season=2008&#038;displayPage=tab_gamecenter&#038;week=REG3\" target=\"_blank\">this game<\/a>? Because I don&#8217;t. Green Bay by a field goal.<\/p>\n<p><b>Minnesota (+3) at Tennessee<\/b><br \/>Great start aside, I&#8217;m still convinced the Titans are going to fade. (Of course, that&#8217;s what I thought about the Tampa Bay Rays.) But it&#8217;s not gonna start this week. This game is all defense, and the Titans are not only slightly better on that side of the ball, they&#8217;re at home. Tennessee wins straight up. Against the spread it&#8217;s a push.<\/p>\n<p><b>San Diego (-7) at Oakland<\/b><br \/>I&#8217;m not sure anyone in Oakland is actually paying attention to football. They&#8217;re all too busy sniping at each other and <a href=\"http:\/\/sports.espn.go.com\/nfl\/news\/story?id=3603082\" target=\"_blank\">fighting with newspaper columnists<\/a>. And why not? At least they&#8217;re pretending to be entertaining. Chargers by 14.<\/p>\n<p><b>Buffalo (-8.5) at St. Louis<\/b><br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/players\/stevenjackson\/profile?id=JAC560875\" target=\"_blank\">Steven Jackson<\/a>, who back to full health, apparently <a href=\"http:\/\/sports.espn.go.com\/nfl\/news\/story?id=3611192\" target=\"_blank\">isn&#8217;t happy<\/a> about his 0-3 team&#8217;s decision to make a change at quarterback. Jackson&#8217;s right in his assertion that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/players\/marcbulger\/profile?id=BUL162264\" target=\"_blank\">Marc Bulger<\/a> isn&#8217;t what&#8217;s wrong with the Rams. Unfortunately for Jackson, there&#8217;s so much that <i>is<\/i> wrong with the Rams, Bulger&#8217;s lack of culpability is almost entirely beside the point. Buffalo by 10.<\/p>\n<p><b>Washington (+11) at Dallas<\/b><br \/>Yeah, you know what? I&#8217;m not getting into this game. There&#8217;s just not that much to say. Dallas is the better team. Dallas is the home team. Dallas wins by nine.<\/p>\n<p><b>Philadelphia (-3) at Chicago<\/b><br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/sports.espn.go.com\/nfl\/news\/story?id=3611385\" target=\"_blank\">Brian Westbrook&#8217;s ankle<\/a> doesn&#8217;t matter. The Eagles should have no trouble moving the ball against a Bears pass D that&#8217;s among the worst in the league. Philly by a touchdown.<\/p>\n<p><b>Baltimore (+7) at Pittsburgh<\/b><br \/>A seven-point spread in this game? Seriously? Is there any real reason to believe that seven points will be scored <i>between<\/i> these two teams? OK, I don&#8217;t really mean that. I think they&#8217;ll combine for 16. Pittsburgh accounts for nine of those.<\/p>\n<div id=\"fb_share_1\" style=\"float: right; margin-left: 10px;;width: 55px;\" name=\"fb_share\"><div id=\"fb-root\"><\/div><script src=\"http:\/\/connect.facebook.net\/en_US\/all.js#appId=125029517579627&amp;xfbml=1\"><\/script><fb:like href=\"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=144\" send=\"false\" layout=\"button_count\" width=\"55\" show_faces=\"false\" font=\"arial\"><\/fb:like><\/div><div class=\"tweetthis\" style=\"text-align:left;\"><p> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"tt\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=Week+Four+Picks+http%3A%2F%2Fthisfootballblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D144\" title=\"Post to Twitter\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"nothumb\" src=\"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/tweet-this\/icons\/en\/twitter\/tt-twitter.png\" alt=\"Post to Twitter\" \/><\/a> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"tt\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=Week+Four+Picks+http%3A%2F%2Fthisfootballblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D144\" title=\"Post to Twitter\">Tweet This Post<\/a><\/p><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve got this weird feeling we may see a number of upsets this week. I have no scientific evidence to support that, mind you. It&#8217;s just that the picking seems too easy, too automatic. And that never seems to work out in professional football. Still, I can&#8217;t tell you where the big upsets are coming. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-144","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=144"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=144"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}