{"id":363,"date":"2013-11-03T10:27:54","date_gmt":"2013-11-03T14:27:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=363"},"modified":"2013-11-03T10:27:54","modified_gmt":"2013-11-03T14:27:54","slug":"week-nine-picks-10","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=363","title":{"rendered":"Week Nine Picks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Let&#8217;s see how much more I can get wrong this week. Here&#8217;s the rest of what not to expect.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong title=\"Atlanta Falcons web site\"><strong><a title=\"Atlanta Falcons web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.atlantafalcons.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Atlanta<\/a><\/strong><\/strong> (+7.5) <strong>at <\/strong><\/strong><a title=\"Carolina Panthers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.panthers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Carolina<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\nThe 2-5 Falcons have one game they should win and two others they could win left on their 2013 schedule. This doesn&#8217;t fall into either category. Panthers by 10.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong><a title=\"Minnesota Vikings web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.vikings.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Minnesota<\/a><\/strong> (+9.5) <strong>at <strong><a title=\"Dallas Cowboys web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dallascowboys.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Dallas<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong>The Cowboys are headed for 8-8 and an NFC East title (followed by a first-round exit from the post-season). The Vikings are headed for 2-12, maybe 3-13 and <em>yet another<\/em> new starting quarterback. That, I suppose, makes the Cowboys the least diseased organization in this matchup. So that&#8217;s gotta feel good. Dallas by 17.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong><a title=\"New Orleans Saints web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.neworleanssaints.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">New Orleans<\/a><\/strong> (-6.5) <strong>at <strong><a title=\"New York Jets web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorkjets.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">NY Jets<\/a><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>Jets owner Woody Johnson says his team is &#8220;<a title=\"Johnson says Jets improving\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/sports\/football\/jets\/jets-owner-sees-young-team-improving-rapidly-article-1.1504082#ixzz2jV5BrZwK\" target=\"_blank\">improving rapidly<\/a>.&#8221; I&#8217;d tend to agree. I mean, look: Two weeks ago in a game against the division rival Patriots, the Jets found a way to <a title=\"New England Patriots at New York Jets, October 20, 2013\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2013102007\/2013\/REG7\/patriots@jets?icampaign=GC_schedule_rr#menu=highlights&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\">come out on top<\/a>. That was disappointing. Then last weekend, the Jets traveled to Cincinnati and <a title=\"New York Jets at Cincinnati Bengals, October 27, 2013\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2013102707\/2013\/REG8\/jets@bengals?icampaign=GC_schedule_rr#menu=highlights&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\">got the snot beat out of them<\/a>. Clearly, they did a much better job last weekend of remembering that they&#8217;re the Jets. That&#8217;s the kind of improvement I like to see. I assume that&#8217;s what Johnson is talking about. Right? Saints by nine.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong><a title=\"Tennessee Titans web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.titansonline.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Tennessee<\/a><\/strong> (-3) <strong>at <strong><a title=\"St. Louis Rams web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.stlouisrams.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">St. Louis<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong>There are probably people out there for whom Jeff Fisher vs. the Titans makes for an interesting story line. I&#8217;m not one of them. I&#8217;m one of those who looks at two mediocre teams squaring off with the winner probably getting the privilege of picking just behind the loser in the 2014 draft and thinks, &#8220;Yeah, that&#8217;s not an interesting story line either.&#8221; Titans by six.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong title=\"Kansas City Chiefs web site\"><a title=\"Kansas City Chiefs web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.kcchiefs.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Kansas City<\/a><\/strong> (-3.5) <strong>at <strong><a title=\"Buffalo Bills web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.buffalobills.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Buffalo<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong>If the Bills can avoid a fatal error, they have a solid chance to pull off a big upset here. It&#8217;s not that I think the Bills are that much better than advertised, or the Chiefs that much worse. It&#8217;s just that Kansas City is due for a loss and Buffalo has a way of beating better teams on their field under the right circumstances. Avoid turnovers (which they&#8217;re completely capable of doing) and the Bills will come out with a victory. Let&#8217;s go out on a limb and call it Buffalo by three.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong title=\"San Diego Chargers web site\"><a title=\"San Diego Chargers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chargers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">San Diego<\/a><\/strong> (pick \u00e2\u20ac\u2122em) <strong>at <strong><a title=\"Washington Redskins web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.redskins.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Washington<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong>The difference between a 4-3 team in the AFC West and a 2-5 team in the NFC East is considerably greater than records alone let on. The only thing likely to slow down the Chargers today is that they have to play an early game on the east coast. That probably helps keep the difference to something like seven. Chargers win.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong><a title=\"Philadelphia Eagles web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.philadelphiaeagles.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Philadelphia<\/a><\/strong> (+2.5) <strong>at <strong><a title=\"Oakland Raiders web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.raiders.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Oakland<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong>Hey, look, it&#8217;s a Super Bowl XV rematch. Or, um, something like that. I wonder if <a title=\"Ron Jaworski web site\" href=\"http:\/\/ronjaworski.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Ron Jaworski<\/a> could run <a title=\"Chip Kelly at Eagles web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.philadelphiaeagles.com\/team\/coaches\/chip-kelly\/1e82ad7a-dd3c-4f69-be3c-8e0ee114e7f3\" target=\"_blank\">Chip Kelly<\/a>&#8216;s offense. Raiders by a touchdown.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong title=\"Tampa Bay Buccanneers web site\"><a title=\"Tampa Bay Buccanneers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.buccaneers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Tampa Bay<\/a><\/strong> (+15.5) <strong>at <strong title=\"Seattle Seahawks web site\"><a title=\"Seattle Seahawks web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.seahawks.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Seattle<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong>I suspect that this game will be much more competitive than anyone thinks. I figure the Bucs keep it close right up through Seattle&#8217;s first offensive possession. After that, it&#8217;s a turkey shoot. Seahawks by 20.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong><a title=\"Baltimore Ravens web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.baltimoreravens.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Baltimore<\/a><\/strong> (-2) <strong>at <strong><a title=\"Cleveland Browns web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.clevelandbrowns.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Cleveland<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong>The only reason I can come up with to think that the Browns could possibly beat the Ravens is that I can&#8217;t come up with a single reason to think that the Browns could possibly beat the Ravens. So I&#8217;m taking the home dogs. Cleveland by a field goal.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong><a title=\"Pittsburgh Steelers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.steelers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Pittsburgh<\/a><\/strong> (+6.5) <strong>at <strong><a title=\"New England Patriots web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.patriots.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">New England<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong>Yeah, the Steelers are bad. And, yeah, they turn the ball over way too often, which is the kiss of death when you&#8217;re facing <a title=\"Bill Belichick at Patriots.com\" href=\"http:\/\/www.patriots.com\/team\/coaches\/bill-belichick\/5c49726a-15ad-4e5a-9246-a30417694eb0\" target=\"_blank\">Bill Belichick<\/a>&#8216;s team. So of course I&#8217;m taking New England. But I&#8217;m not giving more than three points to any opponent of these increasingly banged up Patriots. Not now and probably not eight weeks from now. New England by a field goal.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong title=\"Indianapolis Colts web site\"><a title=\"Indianapolis Colts web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.colts.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Indianapolis<\/a><\/strong> (-2) <strong>at <strong><a title=\"Houston Texans web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.houstontexans.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Houston<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong>In which <a title=\"Case Keenum at NFL.com\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/player\/casekeenum\/2532888\/profile\" target=\"_blank\">Case Keenum<\/a> makes the starting quarterback position in Houston his for the remainder of the season. Texans win a fairly high scoring game by a field goal.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong><a title=\"Chicago Bears web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chicagobears.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Chicago<\/a><\/strong><strong><\/strong> (+10.5) <strong>at<\/strong><\/strong> <a title=\"Green Bay Packers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.packers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Green Bay<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\nOne good thing to have when you&#8217;re trying to win games in the NFL is a quarterback. Green Bay by two touchdowns.<\/p>\n<div id=\"fb_share_1\" style=\"float: right; margin-left: 10px;;width: 55px;\" name=\"fb_share\"><div id=\"fb-root\"><\/div><script src=\"http:\/\/connect.facebook.net\/en_US\/all.js#appId=125029517579627&amp;xfbml=1\"><\/script><fb:like href=\"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=363\" send=\"false\" layout=\"button_count\" width=\"55\" show_faces=\"false\" font=\"arial\"><\/fb:like><\/div><div class=\"tweetthis\" style=\"text-align:left;\"><p> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"tt\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=Week+Nine+Picks+http%3A%2F%2Fthisfootballblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D363\" title=\"Post to Twitter\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"nothumb\" src=\"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/tweet-this\/icons\/en\/twitter\/tt-twitter.png\" alt=\"Post to Twitter\" \/><\/a> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"tt\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=Week+Nine+Picks+http%3A%2F%2Fthisfootballblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D363\" title=\"Post to Twitter\">Tweet This Post<\/a><\/p><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Let&#8217;s see how much more I can get wrong this week. Here&#8217;s the rest of what not to expect. Atlanta (+7.5) at Carolina The 2-5 Falcons have one game they should win and two others they could win left on their 2013 schedule. This doesn&#8217;t fall into either category. Panthers by 10. Minnesota (+9.5) at [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-363","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=363"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/363\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}