{"id":534,"date":"2016-09-18T09:31:06","date_gmt":"2016-09-18T13:31:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=534"},"modified":"2016-09-18T09:31:06","modified_gmt":"2016-09-18T13:31:06","slug":"week-two-picks-13","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=534","title":{"rendered":"Week Two Picks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hey, so far, so not entirely terrible. Adding Thursday night&#8217;s result into the mix, I&#8217;m now at 12-5 straight up, 9-8 against the spread so far this season. As usual, one would hardly be wise to go around wagering actual money based on anything I have to say. But one would hardly be wise to gamble under any circumstances. So I&#8217;m calling the whole thing a win. Sort of. Let&#8217;s see how short-lived this relatively good feeling proves.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s what not to expect in the rest of the week two games.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Tennessee Titans web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.titansonline.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Tennessee<\/a> (+5.5) at <a title=\"Detroit Lions web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.detroitlions.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Detroit<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>This looks to me like the kind of game where the punters might end up wondering why they bothered to suit up. The Lions <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2016091111\/2016\/REG1\/lions@colts#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000702844&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\">won one of those by four points<\/a> last week. I&#8217;ll look for them to do the same here.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Kansas City Chiefs web site\"><a title=\"Kansas City Chiefs web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.kcchiefs.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Kansas City<\/a><\/strong> (+2.5) at <strong title=\"Houston Texans web site\"><a title=\"Houston Texans web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.houstontexans.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Houston<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>Whichever team figures out how to mount a ground offense comes out on top. I&#8217;m gonna guess it&#8217;s the home team. Texans by a field goal.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Miami Dolphins web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.miamidolphins.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Miami<\/a> (+6.5) at <a title=\"New England Patriots web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.patriots.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">New England<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>I learned a valuable lesson <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2016091112\/2016\/REG1\/patriots@cardinals#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000702843&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\">last Sunday night<\/a>. Sadly for me, it was a lesson I&#8217;d already learned years ago and simply found a way to forget. It&#8217;s this: There&#8217;s no value in picking against New England. No matter whom the Patriots are playing. No matter where they&#8217;re playing. No matter what the circumstances. As long as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.patriots.com\/team\/coaches\/roster\/bill-belichick\" target=\"_blank\">Bill Belichick<\/a> is on the sideline, the Pats more often than not are going to find a way to win. That formula presents itself at a fairly simple level this week, with New England hosting a Miami squad that&#8217;s playing its second straight road game and coming off what has to be a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2016091109\/2016\/REG1\/dolphins@seahawks#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000702837&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\">demoralizing late-game collapse in Seattle<\/a>. Games against division rivals have a way of being more competitive than they ought, but I think the Patriots defense (the pass rush in particular) takes control of this one and New England comes away with win by a margin of six.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Baltimore Ravens web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.baltimoreravens.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Baltimore<\/a> (-6.5) at <a title=\"Cleveland Browns web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.clevelandbrowns.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Cleveland<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>Don&#8217;t pay attention to those who claim Cleveland&#8217;s season is already over. The Browns have to play 15 more games just like everybody else. It&#8217;s just that their next 15 games are going to much, much worse than most other teams&#8217;. Ravens by a touchdown.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Cincinnati Bengals web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bengals.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Cincinnati<\/a> (+3.5) at <a title=\"Pittsburgh Steelers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.steelers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Pittsburgh<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>Somebody, somewhere can probably provide some great, prescient insight into how this game is going to play out. Me, I&#8217;ve got what most everybody else has. Don&#8217;t look for much in the running game. Expect a high score. And look for the home team to come out on top. Pittsburgh by three.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Dallas Cowboys web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dallascowboys.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Dallas<\/a> (+3) at <a title=\"Washington Redskins web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.redskins.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Washington<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>Neither of these teams got this season off to an impressive start. But the Cowboys at least <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2016091110\/2016\/REG1\/giants@cowboys#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000703618&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\">hung tight<\/a> against a Giants squad that I believe is better than most observers realize. I&#8217;ll take Dallas to win this one straight up. Let&#8217;s say it&#8217;s by a point.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"New Orleans Saints web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.neworleanssaints.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">New Orleans<\/a> (+5) at <a title=\"New York Giants web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.giants.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">NY Giants<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>I don&#8217;t anticipate quite the shootout I&#8217;ve seen and heard predicted elsewhere. But I do expect both teams to get into the high twenties. Giants by a field goal.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"San Francisco 49ers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.49ers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">San Francisco<\/a> (+13.5) at <a title=\"Carolina Panthers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.panthers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Carolina<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Panthers, who come into this game on 10 days rest, are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2016091110\/2016\/REG1\/giants@cowboys#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000703618&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\">not the Rams<\/a>. I&#8217;m not sure there&#8217;s a whole lot more to say. Carolina by 17.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Tampa Bay Buccanneers web site\"><a title=\"Tampa Bay Buccanneers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.buccaneers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Tampa Bay<\/a><\/strong> (+6.5) at <strong title=\"Arizona Cardinals web site\"><a title=\"Arizona Cardinals web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.azcardinals.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Arizona<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>One could make an argument that no team should be <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2016091112\/2016\/REG1\/patriots@cardinals#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000702843&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\">taken by surprise by the Patriots<\/a> at this point in NFL history. But it happens just the same. Taken by surprise by the Buccaneers? Not so much. The Bucs <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2016091100\/2016\/REG1\/buccaneers@falcons#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000702839&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\">appear to have a pretty good team<\/a>. We&#8217;ll get an idea of just how good by whether \u00e2\u20ac\u201d and perhaps for how long \u00e2\u20ac\u201d they&#8217;re able to stay competitive against a very good Cardinals teams that needs a win to right the ship. It may be close right down to the final minutes, but in the end, even if it&#8217;s by way of a late touchdown that extends the margin, I think Arizona comes out on top by about nine.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Seattle Seahawks web site\"><a title=\"Seattle Seahawks web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.seahawks.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Seattle<\/a><\/strong> (-6.5) at <a title=\"St. Louis Rams web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.therams.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Los Angeles<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>I&#8217;ll admit I went to be fairly early <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2016091201\/2016\/REG1\/rams@49ers#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000702850&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\">Monday night<\/a>, but I was still up later than the Rams. One suspects this first season back in L.A. is going to be longer than anyone realized. Seahawks by 10.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Indianapolis Colts web site\"><a title=\"Indianapolis Colts web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.colts.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Indianapolis<\/a><\/strong> (+6) at <strong title=\"Denver Broncos web site\"><a title=\"Denver Broncos web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.denverbroncos.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Denver<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Broncos appear to be a balanced team. The Colts are not. Denver by a touchdown.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Atlanta Falcons web site\"><a title=\"Atlanta Falcons web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.atlantafalcons.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Atlanta<\/a><\/strong> (+4.5) at <a title=\"Oakland Raiders web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.raiders.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Oakland<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything the Falcons can do to slow down the Raiders offense. Oakland by 14.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Jacksonville Jaguars web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.jaguars.com\" target=\"_blank\">Jacksonville<\/a> (+3) at <strong title=\"San Diego Chargers web site\"><a title=\"San Diego Chargers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chargers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">San Diego<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>One of these teams has to win. Let&#8217;s go with the hosts. Chargers win it straight up. It&#8217;s a push with the points.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Green Bay Packers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.packers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Green Bay<\/a> (-2) at <a title=\"Minnesota Vikings web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.vikings.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Minnesota<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>Both of these teams will be facing much stiffer opposition than they faced in week one. But I suspect the Vikings are facing a slightly tougher bump. Packers by a point.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Philadelphia Eagles web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.philadelphiaeagles.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Philadelphia<\/a> (+3) at <a title=\"Chicago Bears web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chicagobears.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Chicago<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>Another gem of a Monday night matchup. Ugh. Bears by six.<\/p>\n<div id=\"fb_share_1\" style=\"float: right; margin-left: 10px;;width: 55px;\" name=\"fb_share\"><div id=\"fb-root\"><\/div><script src=\"http:\/\/connect.facebook.net\/en_US\/all.js#appId=125029517579627&amp;xfbml=1\"><\/script><fb:like href=\"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=534\" send=\"false\" layout=\"button_count\" width=\"55\" show_faces=\"false\" font=\"arial\"><\/fb:like><\/div><div class=\"tweetthis\" style=\"text-align:left;\"><p> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"tt\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=Week+Two+Picks+http%3A%2F%2Fthisfootballblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D534\" title=\"Post to Twitter\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"nothumb\" src=\"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/tweet-this\/icons\/en\/twitter\/tt-twitter.png\" alt=\"Post to Twitter\" \/><\/a> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"tt\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=Week+Two+Picks+http%3A%2F%2Fthisfootballblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D534\" title=\"Post to Twitter\">Tweet This Post<\/a><\/p><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hey, so far, so not entirely terrible. Adding Thursday night&#8217;s result into the mix, I&#8217;m now at 12-5 straight up, 9-8 against the spread so far this season. As usual, one would hardly be wise to go around wagering actual money based on anything I have to say. But one would hardly be wise to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-534","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/534","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=534"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/534\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=534"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=534"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=534"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}