{"id":579,"date":"2017-09-14T16:35:11","date_gmt":"2017-09-14T20:35:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=579"},"modified":"2017-09-14T16:35:11","modified_gmt":"2017-09-14T20:35:11","slug":"week-two-picks-14","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=579","title":{"rendered":"Week Two Picks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/pitchfork.com\/news\/husker-dus-grant-hart-dead-at-56\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Grant Hart is dead.<\/a> So this week is already officially filled to overflowing with suck. Thanks for nothing, universe.<\/p>\n<p>Oh, also, my week one football picks didn&#8217;t work out so great. I went 9-6 straight up, 8-7 against the spread. I suppose I could have done worse (particularly against the spread). But I could have done a lot better. Let&#8217;s see which direction this miserable week takes me in.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s what not to expect.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Houston Texans web site\"><a title=\"Houston Texans web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.houstontexans.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Houston<\/a><\/strong> (+6.5) at <a title=\"Cincinnati Bengals web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bengals.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cincinnati<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>Both of these teams suffered embarrassing losses in their home openers on Sunday. One of them has to fare at least somewhat better this time out. I&#8217;m thinking it&#8217;ll probably be the one that isn&#8217;t <a href=\"http:\/\/www.espn.com\/nfl\/story\/_\/id\/20700594\/houston-texans-expected-start-rookie-qb-deshaun-watson-week-2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">starting a rookie quarterback<\/a> in a road game on short rest. Just, you know, a hunch. Bengals by two touchdowns.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Tennessee Titans web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.titansonline.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tennessee<\/a> (-2.5) at <a title=\"Jacksonville Jaguars web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.jaguars.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Jacksonville<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>Put me down as yet one more person inclined to think both <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2017091005\/2017\/REG1\/jaguars@texans?icampaign=GC_schedule_rr#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000844230&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Jacksonville&#8217;s big road win<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2017091007\/2017\/REG1\/raiders@titans?icampaign=GC_schedule_rr#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000843875&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tennessee&#8217;s big home loss<\/a> in week one had less to do with the teams facing off here than with the quality of their respective opening weekend opponents. Tennessee by a field goal.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Cleveland Browns web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.clevelandbrowns.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cleveland<\/a> (+7.5) at <a title=\"Baltimore Ravens web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.baltimoreravens.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Baltimore<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>I don&#8217;t know when we&#8217;ll find out whether the Ravens defense is for real. But I feel fairly confident it won&#8217;t be this week. Baltimore logs another shutout, while once again putting double digits on their side of the scoreboard.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Buffalo Bills web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.buffalobills.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Buffalo<\/a> (+7.5) at <a title=\"Carolina Panthers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.panthers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Carolina<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>Facing the Panthers in Charlotte may prove a bit more challenging than <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2017091000\/2017\/REG1\/jets@bills?icampaign=GC_schedule_rr#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000842391&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">hosting the Jets<\/a>. I think. Carolina by six.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"New England Patriots web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.patriots.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">New England<\/a> (-6.5) at <a title=\"New Orleans Saints web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.neworleanssaints.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">New Orleans<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Patriots played terribly in all three phases of the game in their opening night <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2017090700\/2017\/REG1\/chiefs@patriots?icampaign=GC_schedule_rr#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000840761&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">home loss to the Chiefs<\/a>. That&#8217;s not something you expect to see from New England in one consecutive game let alone two. And given that the Saints will be playing on short rest following their own <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2017091100\/2017\/REG1\/saints@vikings?icampaign=GC_schedule_rr#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000844018&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">lackluster losing effort<\/a> in Minnesota Monday night, I&#8217;m thinking that if the Patriots can get it right on offense and special teams this time around, that should be enough to get the job done. Patriots by a touchdown.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Arizona Cardinals web site\"><a title=\"Arizona Cardinals web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.azcardinals.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arizona<\/a><\/strong> (-7.5) at <strong title=\"Indianapolis Colts web site\"><a title=\"Indianapolis Colts web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.colts.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Indianapolis<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2017091009\/2017\/REG1\/colts@rams?icampaign=GC_schedule_rr#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000843354&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">It would appear<\/a> there&#8217;s a chance that no matter who lines up behind center, the Colts are just an awful team. Cardinals by 10.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Philadelphia Eagles web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.philadelphiaeagles.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Philadelphia<\/a> (+4.5) at <strong title=\"Kansas City Chiefs web site\"><a title=\"Kansas City Chiefs web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.kcchiefs.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Kansas City<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>I knew the Chiefs were a good team heading into the season. They may yet be <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2017090700\/2017\/REG1\/chiefs@patriots?icampaign=GC_schedule_rr#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000840761&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">better than I realized<\/a>. Kansas City by nine.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Minnesota Vikings web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.vikings.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Minnesota<\/a> (+6) at <a title=\"Pittsburgh Steelers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.steelers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pittsburgh<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>I&#8217;d pick the home team in this matchup no matter where it was being played. Pittsburgh by three.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Chicago Bears web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chicagobears.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Chicago<\/a> (+7) at <strong title=\"Tampa Bay Buccanneers web site\"><a title=\"Tampa Bay Buccanneers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.buccaneers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tampa Bay<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Buccaneers finally get to open their season. And they do it with a win. Tampa by 10.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Miami Dolphins web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.miamidolphins.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Miami<\/a> (+4.5) at <strong title=\"San Diego Chargers web site\"><a title=\"San Diego Chargers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chargers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LA Chargers<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Dolphins also get a late start on kicking off their 2017 campaign. The Chargers, meanwhile, officially take a run at starting that new tiny stadium trend they&#8217;ve been talking about. Los Angeles Jr. by seven.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"New York Jets web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorkjets.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NY Jets<\/a> (+14) at <a title=\"Oakland Raiders web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.raiders.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Oakland<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Jets reportedly are planning to make the most of their final visit to the Black Hole by cosplaying as a real NFL football team. They won&#8217;t play like one, of course. But one can only ask so much. Raiders by 20.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Washington Redskins web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.redskins.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Washington<\/a> (+2.5) at <a title=\"St. Louis Rams web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.therams.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LA Rams<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Racists are probably better than the Colts. Probably. Rams by four.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Dallas Cowboys web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dallascowboys.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dallas<\/a> (-2) at <strong title=\"Denver Broncos web site\"><a title=\"Denver Broncos web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.denverbroncos.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Denver<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Cowboys are almost certainly better than the Chargers. Better than the Broncos, too, for that matter. Dallas by six.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"San Francisco 49ers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.49ers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">San Francisco<\/a> (+13.5) at <strong title=\"Seattle Seahawks web site\"><a title=\"Seattle Seahawks web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.seahawks.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Seattle<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>Oof! Seahawks by 17.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Green Bay Packers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.packers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Green Bay<\/a> (+2.5) at <strong title=\"Atlanta Falcons web site\"><a title=\"Atlanta Falcons web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.atlantafalcons.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Atlanta<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Falcons caught a break when they <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2017091001\/2017\/REG1\/falcons@bears?icampaign=GC_schedule_rr#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000841803&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">drew the Bears<\/a> as their opening week opponent. Here&#8217;s where the Super Bowl hangover kicks in. Packers by six.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Detroit Lions web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.detroitlions.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Detroit<\/a> (+3.5) at <a title=\"New York Giants web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.giants.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NY Giants<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Lions are still a better team than they get credit for being. But the Giants are a much better than the team we saw on the field <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2017091012\/2017\/REG1\/giants@cowboys?icampaign=GC_schedule_rr#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000843345&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">last Sunday night<\/a>. Better, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cbssports.com\/nfl\/news\/giants-odell-beckham-practices-thursday-for-the-first-time-in-three-weeks\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">probably healthier<\/a>, and playing at home makes a huge difference. New Jersey by five.<\/p>\n<div id=\"fb_share_1\" style=\"float: right; margin-left: 10px;;width: 55px;\" name=\"fb_share\"><div id=\"fb-root\"><\/div><script src=\"http:\/\/connect.facebook.net\/en_US\/all.js#appId=125029517579627&amp;xfbml=1\"><\/script><fb:like href=\"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=579\" send=\"false\" layout=\"button_count\" width=\"55\" show_faces=\"false\" font=\"arial\"><\/fb:like><\/div><div class=\"tweetthis\" style=\"text-align:left;\"><p> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"tt\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=Week+Two+Picks+http%3A%2F%2Fthisfootballblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D579\" title=\"Post to Twitter\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"nothumb\" src=\"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/tweet-this\/icons\/en\/twitter\/tt-twitter.png\" alt=\"Post to Twitter\" \/><\/a> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"tt\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=Week+Two+Picks+http%3A%2F%2Fthisfootballblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D579\" title=\"Post to Twitter\">Tweet This Post<\/a><\/p><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Grant Hart is dead. So this week is already officially filled to overflowing with suck. Thanks for nothing, universe. Oh, also, my week one football picks didn&#8217;t work out so great. I went 9-6 straight up, 8-7 against the spread. I suppose I could have done worse (particularly against the spread). But I could have [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-579","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=579"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=579"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=579"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=579"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}