{"id":587,"date":"2017-10-06T15:57:19","date_gmt":"2017-10-06T19:57:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=587"},"modified":"2017-10-06T15:59:19","modified_gmt":"2017-10-06T19:59:19","slug":"week-five-picks-post-thursday-night","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=587","title":{"rendered":"Week Five Picks (post Thursday night)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Well, so far so average.<\/p>\n<p>I managed to peg the winner of the Thursday night game straight up. And outcome was a push with the five points Tampa Bay was getting. So, you know, there was no getting that one wrong (or right).<\/p>\n<p>I guess I&#8217;ll take it.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s what not to expect from this week&#8217;s remaining games.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"San Diego Chargers web site\"><a title=\"San Diego Chargers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chargers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LA Chargers<\/a><\/strong> (+3.5) at <a title=\"New York Giants web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.giants.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NY Giants<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>These two teams are pretty much identical, right down to their 0-4 records. In this type of situation you look for the home team not to lose. Giants by three.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Buffalo Bills web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.buffalobills.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Buffalo<\/a> (+3) at <a title=\"Cincinnati Bengals web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bengals.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cincinnati<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Bills may or may not turn out to be for real. But until I see clear evidence to the contrary, I&#8217;m going to be of the opinion that Buffalo&#8217;s a lot closer to real than Cincinnati. Bills by six.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"New York Jets web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorkjets.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NY Jets<\/a> (+1) at <a title=\"Cleveland Browns web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.clevelandbrowns.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cleveland<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>Um &#8230; um &#8230; um &#8230; . Hmmm. Yeah, I&#8217;ve got nothing. Jets, I guess. Maybe by a field goal?<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Jacksonville Jaguars web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.jaguars.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Jacksonville<\/a> (+8.5) at <a title=\"Pittsburgh Steelers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.steelers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pittsburgh<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>You can&#8217;t <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2017100108\/2017\/REG4\/jaguars@jets#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000854153&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">lose to the Jets<\/a> in New Jersey one week, then turn around and beat the Steelers in Pittsburgh the next. I don&#8217;t think you can, anyhow. I mean, right? Except, you know, the Jaguars probably will. But I&#8217;m not picking that. Steelers by a touchdown.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Tennessee Titans web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.titansonline.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tennessee<\/a> (-3) at <a title=\"Miami Dolphins web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.miamidolphins.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Miami<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>Know what the Dolphins do well? Nothing, really. Titans by four.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"San Francisco 49ers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.49ers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">San Francisco<\/a> (+1.5) at <strong title=\"Indianapolis Colts web site\"><a title=\"Indianapolis Colts web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.colts.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Indianapolis<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>It&#8217;s fairly easy to take advantage of the Colts&#8217; horrendous defense. If you have an offense. Too bad for the Niners. Indy by three.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Arizona Cardinals web site\"><a title=\"Arizona Cardinals web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.azcardinals.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arizona<\/a><\/strong> (+6.5) at <a title=\"Philadelphia Eagles web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.philadelphiaeagles.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Philadelphia<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>I don&#8217;t know how long the Eagles are going to be able to maintain the success they&#8217;ve had over the first quarter of the season. But I don&#8217;t think a one-dimensional squad like the Cardinals poses much of a threat. Philadelphia by nine.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Carolina Panthers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.panthers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Carolina<\/a> (+2.5) at <a title=\"Detroit Lions web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.detroitlions.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Detroit<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>A second straight road game and an opponent with an actual defense is not a formula for a Carolina win. Lions by six.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Seattle Seahawks web site\"><a title=\"Seattle Seahawks web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.seahawks.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Seattle<\/a><\/strong> (+1) at <a title=\"St. Louis Rams web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.therams.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LA Rams<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>It just doesn&#8217;t seem like this is the Seahawks&#8217; year, does it? Of course, it won&#8217;t ultimately be the Rams&#8217; year either unless they grow a defense. But that&#8217;s a matter for another day. Los Angeles by seven.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Baltimore Ravens web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.baltimoreravens.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Baltimore<\/a>\u00c2\u00a0(+2.5) at <a title=\"Oakland Raiders web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.raiders.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Oakland<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Raiders might still be an average-ish football team even <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/news\/story\/0ap3000000857147\/article\/derek-carr-throws-at-start-of-oakland-raiders-practice\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">without Derek Carr<\/a> behind center. And average-ish seems to be all it takes to handle the sputtering Ravens this season. Raiders by one takeaway and one point.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Green Bay Packers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.packers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Green Bay<\/a> (+2.5) at <a title=\"Dallas Cowboys web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dallascowboys.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dallas<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Packers haven&#8217;t been so great at stopping the run this season. That could potentially be a problem in this game. But I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll be enough of a problem to cost Green Bay a win. Packers by three.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Kansas City Chiefs web site\"><a title=\"Kansas City Chiefs web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.kcchiefs.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Kansas City<\/a><\/strong> (-1) at <strong title=\"Houston Texans web site\"><a title=\"Houston Texans web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.houstontexans.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Houston<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>Traveling on a short week after a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2017100200\/2017\/REG4\/redskins@chiefs#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000855690&amp;tab=recap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">hard-fought win<\/a> in Washington Monday night could make this matchup a difficult one for the Chiefs. I&#8217;m reluctant to pick against Kansas City, a team that has earned its status as the NFL&#8217;s last undefeated team. But I think I&#8217;m going to take a chance here. Texans by a point.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Minnesota Vikings web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.vikings.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Minnesota<\/a> (-3) at <a title=\"Chicago Bears web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chicagobears.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Chicago<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>I&#8217;m sure <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/player\/mitchelltrubisky\/2558008\/profile\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mitchell Trubisky<\/a>&#8216;s going to do just fine. Eventually. Vikings by a touchdown.<\/p>\n<div id=\"fb_share_1\" style=\"float: right; margin-left: 10px;;width: 55px;\" name=\"fb_share\"><div id=\"fb-root\"><\/div><script src=\"http:\/\/connect.facebook.net\/en_US\/all.js#appId=125029517579627&amp;xfbml=1\"><\/script><fb:like href=\"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=587\" send=\"false\" layout=\"button_count\" width=\"55\" show_faces=\"false\" font=\"arial\"><\/fb:like><\/div><div class=\"tweetthis\" style=\"text-align:left;\"><p> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"tt\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=Week+Five+Picks+%28post+Thursday+night%29+http%3A%2F%2Fthisfootballblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D587\" title=\"Post to Twitter\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"nothumb\" src=\"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/tweet-this\/icons\/en\/twitter\/tt-twitter.png\" alt=\"Post to Twitter\" \/><\/a> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"tt\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=Week+Five+Picks+%28post+Thursday+night%29+http%3A%2F%2Fthisfootballblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D587\" title=\"Post to Twitter\">Tweet This Post<\/a><\/p><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Well, so far so average. I managed to peg the winner of the Thursday night game straight up. And outcome was a push with the five points Tampa Bay was getting. So, you know, there was no getting that one wrong (or right). I guess I&#8217;ll take it. Here&#8217;s what not to expect from this [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-587","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/587","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=587"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/587\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=587"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=587"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=587"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}