{"id":653,"date":"2018-11-15T14:11:20","date_gmt":"2018-11-15T18:11:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=653"},"modified":"2018-11-15T14:11:20","modified_gmt":"2018-11-15T18:11:20","slug":"week-eleven-picks-12","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=653","title":{"rendered":"Week Eleven Picks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Week ten was rough enough that I can&#8217;t really get worked up about my 9-5 finish picking straight up.<\/p>\n<p>What about 5-8-1 against the spread? Yeah. Ugh.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m now 91-55-2 (.622) straight up, 66-75-7 (.470) against the spread for the season.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s see if I can&#8217;t make it worse. Here&#8217;s what not to expect in week eleven.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Green Bay Packers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.packers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Green Bay<\/a> (+3) at <strong title=\"Seattle Seahawks web site\"><a title=\"Seattle Seahawks web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.seahawks.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Seattle<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>I can&#8217;t for the life of me figure out how the Packers are getting points from the lowly Seahawks here. I mean, I keep hearing\/reading about how <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfl.com\/player\/aaronrodgers\/2506363\/profile\">Aaron Rodgers&#8217;<\/a> team still has a great shot not only of getting to but <a href=\"https:\/\/www.si.com\/nfl\/2018\/11\/11\/green-bay-packers-super-bowl-chances-michael-thomas-cell-phone-cleveland-browns-luck-caravan-ad-nbc\">winning the Super Bowl<\/a>. And, you know, if you don&#8217;t count their four losses, the Packers are undefeated. Think about that for a minute. Meanwhile Seattle is a mere 4-5. And since Aaron Rodgers isn&#8217;t their quarterback, all of the Seahawks&#8217; losses count. So, yeah, I for one believe firmly that the 4-0(4)-1 Packers can travel to Seattle on short rest, figure out how to play run defense on the way, and beat a home team that has effectively lost its division and has its back against the wall in the wild card chase. Totally. Either that or I figure the Seahawks win this one by roughly six points. Um, let&#8217;s just go with that last thing.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Carolina Panthers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.panthers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Carolina<\/a> (-4) at <a title=\"Detroit Lions web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.detroitlions.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Detroit<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Panthers have had <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2018110800\/2018\/REG10\/panthers@steelers\">a lot to think about<\/a> over the last week, none of it pleasant. I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;re about ready to take out some of their angrier thoughts on someone. And, well, there&#8217;s that thing where the Lions have given up on the season. Carolina by a touchdown.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Dallas Cowboys web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dallascowboys.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dallas<\/a> (+3) at <strong title=\"Atlanta Falcons web site\"><a title=\"Atlanta Falcons web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.atlantafalcons.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Atlanta<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>I&#8217;m beginning to get the sense that the postseason may need to happen without either of these teams. Unbalanced home team beats unbalanced road team. By a point.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Cincinnati Bengals web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bengals.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cincinnati<\/a> (+4) at <a title=\"Baltimore Ravens web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.baltimoreravens.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Baltimore<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Bengals can lose this game and still fool themselves into believing they can recover and make a run at a wild card slot. The Ravens can&#8217;t. So <a href=\"https:\/\/www.baltimoresun.com\/sports\/ravens\/bs-sp-ravens-lamar-jackson-joe-flacco-20181114-story.html\">whatever quarterback Baltimore puts on the field<\/a> needs to take advantage of Cincinnati&#8217;s disaster of a defense. I suspect he will. Ravens by a field goal.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Pittsburgh Steelers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.steelers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pittsburgh<\/a> (-5.5) at <a title=\"Jacksonville Jaguars web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.jaguars.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Jacksonville<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Jaguars haven&#8217;t won a game since week four. They&#8217;ve <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nfl.com\/gamecenter\/2018091612\/2018\/REG2\/patriots@jaguars\">beaten exactly one good team<\/a> all season. And that was in week two. It&#8217;s hard to see anything but a brutal outcome here. Steelers by 14.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Tennessee Titans web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.titansonline.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tennessee<\/a> (+2) at <strong title=\"Indianapolis Colts web site\"><a title=\"Indianapolis Colts web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.colts.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Indianapolis<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Colts have no defense. The Titans have nothing but defense. Indy by three, I guess.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Houston Texans web site\"><a title=\"Houston Texans web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.houstontexans.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Houston<\/a><\/strong> (-3) at <a title=\"Washington Redskins web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.redskins.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Washington<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Texans have gone from 0-3 to 6-3, which is pretty nice for them. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what happens when they next run into a good opponent. But that may not be until January. Unless it&#8217;s here. I still have no idea what to make of the Racists. Maybe they&#8217;re actually a decent football team. If they are, they win this one. If not &#8230; Texans by one.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Tampa Bay Buccanneers web site\"><a title=\"Tampa Bay Buccanneers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.buccaneers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tampa Bay<\/a><\/strong> (+1.5) at <a title=\"New York Giants web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.giants.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NY Giants<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>Are the 2018 Giants actually capable of winning two straight? If it costs them draft position, yeah, I&#8217;m quite sure they are. New Jersey by four.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Denver Broncos web site\"><a title=\"Denver Broncos web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.denverbroncos.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Denver<\/a><\/strong> (+7) at <strong title=\"San Diego Chargers web site\"><a title=\"San Diego Chargers web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chargers.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LA Chargers<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>The Chargers continue to over-inflate their reputation by beating up on also-rans.\u00c2\u00a0 Los Angeles by 10.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Oakland Raiders web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.raiders.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Oakland<\/a> (+5) at <strong title=\"Arizona Cardinals web site\"><a title=\"Arizona Cardinals web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.azcardinals.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arizona<\/a><\/strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>I could have this wrong, but I suspect that when you&#8217;re getting five points from a team that averages less than two touchdowns per game it&#8217;s a sign either that you&#8217;re in serious trouble or that maybe, just maybe, the handicappers have it in their heads that you secretly want to lose. Cardinals by six.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Philadelphia Eagles web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.philadelphiaeagles.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Philadelphia<\/a> (+8.5) at <a title=\"New Orleans Saints web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.neworleanssaints.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">New Orleans<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>If there&#8217;s anyone out there today who still believes the Eagles can repeat as champions, one suspects they&#8217;ll be disabused of that notion by the time this game is halfway over. Saints by 17.<\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Minnesota Vikings web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.vikings.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Minnesota<\/a> (+2.5) at <a title=\"Chicago Bears web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chicagobears.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Chicago<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>If the Bears win here, they likely won&#8217;t need to worry about the week 17 rematch in Minnesota. (They should be locked in as the NFC three seed by that point.) Chicago by five.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong title=\"Kansas City Chiefs web site\"><a title=\"Kansas City Chiefs web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.kcchiefs.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Kansas City<\/a><\/strong> (+3.5) at <a title=\"St. Louis Rams web site\" href=\"http:\/\/www.therams.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">LA Rams<\/a><br \/>\n<\/strong>Neither team will be seen in Mexico City. Neither defense will be seen in Los Angeles. Rams by a field goal.<\/p>\n<div id=\"fb_share_1\" style=\"float: right; margin-left: 10px;;width: 55px;\" name=\"fb_share\"><div id=\"fb-root\"><\/div><script src=\"http:\/\/connect.facebook.net\/en_US\/all.js#appId=125029517579627&amp;xfbml=1\"><\/script><fb:like href=\"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/?p=653\" send=\"false\" layout=\"button_count\" width=\"55\" show_faces=\"false\" font=\"arial\"><\/fb:like><\/div><div class=\"tweetthis\" style=\"text-align:left;\"><p> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"tt\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=Week+Eleven+Picks+http%3A%2F%2Fthisfootballblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D653\" title=\"Post to Twitter\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"nothumb\" src=\"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/tweet-this\/icons\/en\/twitter\/tt-twitter.png\" alt=\"Post to Twitter\" \/><\/a> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"tt\" href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=Week+Eleven+Picks+http%3A%2F%2Fthisfootballblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D653\" title=\"Post to Twitter\">Tweet This Post<\/a><\/p><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Week ten was rough enough that I can&#8217;t really get worked up about my 9-5 finish picking straight up. What about 5-8-1 against the spread? Yeah. Ugh. I&#8217;m now 91-55-2 (.622) straight up, 66-75-7 (.470) against the spread for the season. Let&#8217;s see if I can&#8217;t make it worse. Here&#8217;s what not to expect in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-653","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/653","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=653"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/653\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.thisfootballblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}